Thanks to Melissa for letting me know that the Russian Burda site has the entire March preview available for viewing. (I can’t wrap my head around how the various language sites have such varied content. What exactly are the good folks at Burda Russia doing that they can get everything out there so promptly? Wouldn’t you think the Germans would have all the content first? Anyway, go Russia- keep it up!)
So, if you were disappointed by yesterday’s limited sneak preview, the good news is that there are some nice options in March. This wrap shirt looks chic and practical:
(Fortunately the Selfish Seamstress knows a little Russian and is able to read the image titles, so she knows for sure that the garment featured is the shirt and not the spandex pants! Boo for spandex pants!)
This pencil skirt is cute and it shows up in a few variations, but the pockets on this one look particularly promising:
But most of all, I am coveting this adorable strapless sundress. It looks like a simple enough dress, and I think it’s really that cute pink floral print that’s getting me. I don’t generally think of myself as a pink floral type, but this is just too adorable, and the lines of the dress keep it sophisticated rather than frou-frou-tutu. (Amber, are you there? And if so, are you drooling over this dress? I thought you might be.)
As for the Plusmode dress and coat combo that I was giddy about from yesterday’s preview, it turns out that the dress is indeed beautiful. I do wish, however, that they hadn’t put the model in such unflattering shapewear. She’s gorgeous with a gorgeous figure and I fully understand the benefits of shapewear under formal dresses, but whatever contraption she’s got under the dress is not doing good things.
The same dress in a longer version either with a different undergarment or else photographed in such a way that the undergarment is not doing horrible binding things to the model is just stunning (and the dude’s pants fit this time):
And finally, since you were wondering, the shrest makes not one but TWO appearances in the March issue. They loved it so much that they made it in two variations. Because apparently some people want to wear it with a wedding gown.
This throws a bit of a stick into the Selfish Seamstress’s wedding guest plans. So many people have invited her to their weddings under the condition that she wear a shrest. But should she wear a shrest if the bride herself might be wearing one? Seems a bit gauche.
Oh, and in case you were wondering, the shrest is NOT the single most ridiculous thing in the March issue. This is:
And yes, I will wear this WITH the navy leopard print shrest to your wedding IF you let me have two slices of cake AND make me maid of honor AND let me pick my favorite of all of your wedding presents to keep for myself. And that includes the checks, for those of you with wealthy aunts and uncles. Cheetah print harem pant jumpsuits don’t come for free, you know. Neither does the Selfish Seamstress’s dignity.
32 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 5, 2010 at 2:45 pm
jen coyle
I assure you, I will not be wearing a shrest, you are totally in the clear. I think it would be perfection with that cheetah jumpsuit. You definitely need to use contrasting animal prints, colors and textures for the ultimate style statement. I think some suede fringe booties would be only acceptable footwear.
February 5, 2010 at 2:48 pm
selfishseamstress
Fortunately, I’m guessing that Burda will sometime in the coming months include some instructions for how to attach your own homemade fringe to a pair of purchased booties. After that we should be good to go.
February 6, 2010 at 8:17 am
Rosesred
Lucky you! Burda already did an item about that! 08-2009, Link
Now nothing can stand in the way between you and the perfect weddingguest outfit!
February 5, 2010 at 2:58 pm
Katie
Wow… I’m not sure that anything can save this issue – even a great wrap shirt, pencil skirt and pink dress. That jumpsuit – I may have nightmares. Also, a few issues ago there WAS instructions for fringing your own boots! You’ll be set for all your wedding guesting functions!
February 5, 2010 at 4:16 pm
selfishseamstress
Gasp! I thought there might have been! And now it’s coming back to me in a flood of terror. There were a whole bunch of fringe projects! They were sticking fringe to everything- you’re right, I remember now!
February 5, 2010 at 3:17 pm
Toby Wollin
One of my great frustrations with Burda WOF (and I’ve been taking it since 2004) is that so many times the “wow” factor of the item is the fabric, fabric that no one in these United States can find at any retailer, brick and mortar or internet.
February 5, 2010 at 3:48 pm
kathleen
acckk – cheetah print harem pant jumpsuit! nooooooooooooooo
February 5, 2010 at 3:58 pm
peter
Cathy happens to love the cheetah print harem pant jumpsuit — go figure.
I think I’m going to have to figure out how this whole Burda thing works. Do you have to speak Russian? Hope not!
February 5, 2010 at 4:05 pm
selfishseamstress
Cathy is just about the only person on whom the cheetah harem jumpsuit would work. But now I’m imagining the horrors of both me and Cathy showing up at a wedding wearing the same cheetah jumpsuit. Awkward!
That issue of Burda should be available on newsstands at the end of February in English if you’re buying it in the US. (I buy mine in German through a German magazine company.) You can get it at Paron in NYC and some Borders and Barnes and Nobles branches carry it too. Have your tracing paper ready!
February 5, 2010 at 5:08 pm
Beangirl
you can also subscribe to it in English from GLP (which I think stands for German Language Press, but could just as easily stand for Gertrude Langenhoppfer’s Panties for all I know– the address is online and listed in the distributor section of the English-language versions).
February 5, 2010 at 5:17 pm
Beangirl
1) this will be somewhat cliché at this point, I suppose, but if that model is a plus sized model I really really really want to be plus sized. Or rather, I want to be HER plus size, not mine. Because she looks amazing in the good photo of her, not to mention just a little bit terrifying. Although she could, in all honesty, use some boob support of some kind. If we were being picky.
She looks like shet in the other photo and should sue.
2) leaopard-print harem-pant jumpsuit. I think that actually says it all. But: So totally awesome, it hurts. If you’re a lounge singer. Or a disco tribute band. Now just where did I put my ABBA collection again…?
February 5, 2010 at 5:32 pm
Catherine
It just so happens I have in the market for a schmick wrap collared top, and a nice pencil skirt, AND a plus-sized evening frock… way to be unselfish, selfish seamstress…
(just kidding, you are STILL totally selfish… just wanted to see if you were paying attention ;) )
February 5, 2010 at 6:43 pm
Angie R.
I kinda love the cropped, harem-style jumpsuit in a Bianca Jagger, Studio 54 way………….runs for cover
February 5, 2010 at 6:53 pm
Sarah
Oh, man. I am torn on the foundation garment switcheroo.
The lack of breast support in the long dress leaves me fearing any quick-paced dances (Not to mention the liklihood that she might drop something at dinner and have to bend over and turn a bit – POP!
It kills me. And it seems like one of the other photos from your previous sneak peek showed the model’s bra right through the fabric.
What’s the deal Burda Mag? Some kind of embargo on fine foundation garments from France and Italy?
February 5, 2010 at 6:55 pm
Sarah
Obviously I am hallucinating on the previous photo… perhaps it was in my most recently arriving issue…
February 5, 2010 at 8:07 pm
Sarah
got it. February 2010 issue Blouse 114
http://www.burdafashion.com/en/Magazines/burda_style/114_Blouse__124_B_Skirt/1270777-1000019-1764727-1764797-1765069.html
Silly.
February 5, 2010 at 8:12 pm
CGCouture
Holy shet Batman! That jumpsuit is terrible! LOL @ the shrest w/a wedding gown. Who in their right mind…?!? I like the top shirt, but what I’m REALLY coveting are the shoes from the first two pictures–especially the ones paired up with the skirt! I.must.have.those.shoes!!!!
February 5, 2010 at 9:30 pm
Kathi
I have just looked at the preview. I don’t know, I think the neon yellow dress with the ruffles at the bottom may be the better dress to wear when you attend weddings!! I really wanted to paste it in my comment, but I can’t figure out a way to do that!
February 6, 2010 at 1:52 am
Val
Aww come on Ms Selfish we know you can do elegant little strapless numbers. I’d just love to see you do the cheetah jumpsuit…at a wedding… with or without Cathy
psst can you do big hair?
February 6, 2010 at 4:50 am
Sar's
Hills Bills! If you are willing to wear the cheetah jumpsuit, my husband and I will renew our vows in some kooky ceremony BUT only if you hold the same angry crotch pose the model is doing for all of the wedding photographs and at least part of the bridal waltz.
February 6, 2010 at 8:27 am
Holly
Just came across your blog and love it, I love your sense of humor, and your clothes are fantastic. Thanks for the inspiration.
February 6, 2010 at 12:11 pm
The Cruel Countess
>….now I’m imagining the horrors of both me and Cathy showing up at a
wedding wearing the same cheetah jumpsuit. Awkward!<
No, the Catfight of the Century! I would buy tickets to see that…especially if champagne is available.
February 7, 2010 at 5:55 pm
nancy K
They do do a great job of finding gorgeous fabrics. I love all of the animal prints, though a bit much in a jumpsuit. Too bad we can’t find them here.
There are some promising patterns here, better than the last few months have been. I also want to know why the Russian language version always gets it all up first? Where is that famous German efficiency
February 7, 2010 at 6:01 pm
Meredith P
Peter, I can see Cathy rockin’ that crotch pose in the jumpsuit. How do you think she would accessorize that…erm…stunning ensemble.
February 8, 2010 at 2:07 am
senaSews
The strapless dress is too cute. But what the heck is going on with the people at Burda?! A shrest and a cheetah print jumpsuit? That’s too much for one issue! Even for Burda …..
February 8, 2010 at 8:53 am
amber
I’m here and yes, I’m totally drooling at that little pink frock! If only I wasn’t frightened of strapless dresses in the best of circumstances, I might actually try to replicate this. But, who knows. I’m going to Mood in two weeks and I’m not sure what is going to beg to come home with me. ;)
February 27, 2010 at 5:11 pm
topstitched
>….now I’m imagining the horrors of both me and Cathy showing up at a
wedding wearing the same cheetah jumpsuit. Awkward!<
what gives SS? Surely you'd be making it your own …..in ZEBRA print!
February 28, 2010 at 2:29 pm
topstitched
about the pose for that jumpsuit – do you think that it’s just maybe an hommage to Diana Ross who is stiking an equally striking jumpsuit pose on p43 of Burda 4/2009?
March 1, 2010 at 3:58 am
Karin
Mhm… I’ve looked through all of it an I think I’ll simply give up on Burda. Patrones is just SO much better, style-wise. The last issue of Burda wasn’t much fun either, while Patrones rocked.
It’s a sham it’s twice as expensive and in spanish, that I don’t speak… oh well, excellent opportunity to learn!
March 1, 2010 at 9:12 am
Burda 4.2010 preview: Innocuous. « The Selfish Seamstress
[…] clothes that you could buy anywhere.” On one hand there’s nothing totally insane, no cheetah jumpsuits, no wedding dresses with crepe paper nosegays hot glued to them, no shrests, no pirate armwarmers, no one shouldered skankgear. And yet on the other hand, there are zero […]
March 2, 2010 at 10:14 am
The cheater way to Burdify « The Selfish Seamstress
[…] access to a store that sells the issues. I have to say, it’s awfully convenient, and now that cute strapless dress from the March issue is getting awfully tempting. But it’s not without its downsides too. For one thing, like I […]
April 22, 2010 at 8:49 am
St. Seraphina | "That's a dancer's leg, Margaret!"
[…] I saw a preview of the March issue, which included a picture of the prettiest pale blue dress I’ve ever seen. And it came with […]